Archive for the ‘Property’ Category

Climate good for investor buyers

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

By Terry Ryder, 16th July 2008

You make money in real estate when you buy, not when you sell. The essence of good property investment is buying well.

That’s why I’ve become a buyer since the market and the mood of the public turned south. The current economic and real estate climate is, for me, the ideal circumstance to secure the real estate which will grow my financial security in the future.

Fortunately for me, everyone else seems to be doing the opposite. There’s been a stampede in the wrong direction and I’m happy to be running against the herd. I seem to have the whole territory to myself.

For reasons I’ve never understood, most people seek to create wealth by doing what the masses are doing. They wait until a market is booming before buying. They follow the pack into the frenetic market and buy at or near the peak. No one ever secured their future behaving like this.

One of the oldest maxims in wealth creation is that you buy when everyone is selling and sell when everyone is buying. If there’s a common denominator among the histories of people who have made serious money, it’s that they detached themselves from the herd and moved independently, often counter-cyclically. They did the opposite of the masses.

Most people, however, like the comfort of the herd, even when it’s stampeding towards a precipice. When the market goes cold, buyers go into hibernation. And, inexplicably, home owners suddenly want to become sellers.

The number of homes listed for sale in Perth has trebled since the WA property boom ended. Listings have risen in Brisbane and elsewhere since the market went pear-shaped. People who bought in the boom want to be sellers in a declining market. It baffles me.

I want to be a buyer now because the heat is gone from the market, there’s no competition for the properties that interest me and I can negotiate from a position of strength. I know interest rates have risen but I also know that rental markets are tight and rental increases are compensating for higher borrowing costs. I also know that every time interest rates rise, the balance of power tips more in favour of investors - the outcome is fewer home owners and more renters. And, with too few homes being built, the already-serious housing shortage will continue to push up rents

People too easily allow themselves to be affected by negative news. There’s no shortage of it lately. Home lending has fallen for four consecutive months. Survey shows consumer sentiment is at its lowest since the early Nineties. We’ve even had one research company, hungry for a bit of publicity, claiming Australia is heading for a one-in-100-years slump.

This kind of media has added to public pain from too many rises in interest rates, petrol prices and grocery bills. It’s had a dramatic impact on the public psyche and property markets have braked sharply.

Brisbane research analyst Michael Matusik says today’s climate feels a lot like 2005. He says: “The residential market is going through a consolidation period - similar to that experienced in late 2005. The market improved considerably between mid-2006 and the end of calendar 2007, surprising many with the strength of this recovery. Despite forecasts of price falls (infamously by over 10%, according to one Aussie icon) and a general market crash, residential prices and weekly rents are up around 30% since late 2006.”

Matusik says the fundamentals now are the same as they were in 2005 and forecasts that residential property prices will increase on average about 8% a year over the next three years. He expects price growth to be stronger in Queensland and Victoria because of higher migration intakes.

The analogy with 2005 is a good one. In 2005 a pack follower would have avoided Melbourne property. The market was flat, prices were stagnating and sentiment was low. But the individual hunter would have been on the prowl at that time. After a couple of busy and buoyant years, the Melbourne market was quiet and it was taking a long time for property to sell.

This represented opportunity to the switched-on investor. Opportunity to take your time, do thorough research and buy without pressure. Opportunity to find good property without competition from others and to negotiate hard. A buyer’s market.

These are the successful investors - the ones who ignore the present and consider the future.

Investors who bought in Footscray in 2005 or 2006, when things were quiet, are smiling now. Values have risen steadily since then, including a 20% rise in the 12 months to March. The individual would have bought in 2005, the pack animal early in 2008, just before the market went into decline.

The market in Frankston touched bottom around 2005. Those who bought then have seen their values rising strongly over the past 2-3 years, including 13% in the year to March. Ditto near-city Carlton, where median prices for both houses and units dropped in 2005 but have climbed sharply since.

The thing Footscray, Frankston and Carlton (suburbs I’ve chosen at random) have in common is a long-term growth average around 12% (average capital growth over 10 years) and identifiable reasons for prices to grow. It’s the future that’s important, not the present.

The climate today presents similar opportunities for investors able to think and act independently. Consider the fundamentals. Migration into Australia is at record highs, providing record overall population growth. Economic and employment growth remains strong - and is widespread, not just confined to the resources states.

At the same time, the housing market is under-supplied. We continue to build homes in numbers that are well below underlying demand. Vacancies are extremely low and rents have been rising - and rising.

Matusik says: “New dwelling supply is under-supplied by 32% across Australia - and more so in NSW and Queensland. The under-supply of new stock is expected to get worse in coming years and some forecast it could remain so for the next decade and beyond. We anticipate annual rental growth of around 12% a year over the next three years.”

These views are supported by many other commentators, including CommSec’s chief economist Craig Jamers, who says: “Australia is experiencing the biggest migration boom on record and the rental market is as tight as a drum - but home buyers are in short supply. There must be a lot more people in shared accommodation or at least staying at home with their parents longer.”

I’ll give the final word to the Herald Sun which reported earlier this week: “Melbourne’s rental market is the tightest it’s been for years. This is a landlords’ market with tenants bidding to rent properties and open-for-inspections crowded with potential applicants.

“As sharemarkets become more volatile, property investment is increasing as an alternative. Although there is strong and growing demand for rental housing by tenants, there are not enough investors in the market.

“So, it could be the right time to invest in residential real estate, with the aim of becoming a landlord.”

Population growth exacerbates housing crisis

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

Bernard Salt | August 07, 2008

WHY all the fuss about the cost of housing and high rents? New house construction is down and rents are up in all capital cities. But surely this crisis cannot simply be a function of high interest rates. After all, today’s rates are still 10 percentage points below peak rates in the late 1980s. If anyone had reason to complain about housing affordability it was 25-34 year olds in the late 80s and early 90s. So what’s going on?

There are several factors that have affected the supply of residential dwellings, including heightened demand. The number of people added to Australia during calendar 2007 was 332,000 or 1.6 per cent. This is the greatest number added to the national population in any year in our nation’s history. And it’s evident in our city’s growth rates.

Melbourne is adding more people (62,000 per year) than any other Australian city. But also running at high rates are both Brisbane and Perth. Even Adelaide and Tasmania are growing at annual rates of 1 per cent instead of 0.5 per cent (or worse) as was the case in the 1990s.

But what is driving this extreme growth?

The most obvious cause is a record level of net overseas migration. Last year we added a net 185,000 migrants, up from a long-term average of 110,000.

At the peak of the last recession in 1992 Australia attracted just 52,000 migrants. Net migration ramps up with rising prosperity: the more jobs on offer, the higher the rate of overseas migration. And judging by a mix of low unemployment and runaway labour costs in some regions, there is probably scope for even greater levels of migration.

But the forces behind the population boom don’t end there. The birth rate has been trending up for six years.

Indeed this rate has taken on the likeness of a hockey stick: a long decline from the early 1980s followed by a modest up-turn from 2002. In 2007 there were 285,000 births in Australia, up from 248,000 five years earlier. The national population increase is now being boosted by a tidy birth-rate kicker equivalent to 37,000 extra babies.

But wait, there’s more. Not only are migration and births up but, wouldn’t you know it, the death rate has plateaued at 135,000 in 2007, up barely 1000 from the previous year.

What we really need to slow down the national growth rate is for those pesky baby boomers to start presenting to the death age group (say 75+). However, we won’t pass this point until the beginning of the 2020s. No use holding our collective breath waiting for the boomers to stop breathing; they aren’t budging. For the moment.

All of these factors push up the demand for dwellings. And it’s not as if we aren’t producing record numbers of households. Some 121,000 households where formed in 2007, up from 64,000 exactly 15 years earlier during the recession. The problem is that this accelerated demand is not finding its way into a sufficient pool of completed dwellings to keep a lid on costs and to provide a healthy alternative to renting. The question is why?

There may be record numbers of new people and households but the odd fact remains that the average household size has flat-lined since 2001. More than 40 years of social change leading to a diminution of the average household size came to a grinding halt this decade. Persons per dwelling dropped from 2.97 in 1991 to 2.76 a decade later and to 2.74 in 2006. It’s almost as if the Australian population is bunching up in existing dwellings rather than forming new households.

The bunch-up factor may be due to increased fertility (more kids per house) but it must be more than this. I suspect that Generation Y is increasingly remaining in the family home postponing commitment to forming their own household.

This might be because they’ve got a good thing going at Mum&Dad’s or, and this is perhaps more accurate, they are dissuaded by the high cost of housing in capital cities.

Neither of these trends were evident in the late 80s: the birth rate continued to drop and Generation X much preferred cruddy student digs to living with the olds. Now the difference may well be that Generation Y are a bunch of middle class softies or Generation X didn’t know how to play the game to their economic advantage.

Lots of people bunching up in burgeoning households preferring not to buy but to rent places pressure on the rental market. The demand for housing remains high, but is out of reach of many Australians who are reluctant to make long-term commitments in uncertain times. Also the cost of housing is a factor: perhaps the result of high interest rates and a constricted supply pipeline.

Planning policy from the beginning of this decade introduced urban growth boundaries designed to limit sprawl. But in so doing this policy acted a bit like a lid on a steaming kettle: rising population growth builds a head of steam and the whole housing issue then threatens to blow into a political issue. And why shouldn’t access to affordable housing be a political issue?

Here we are in one of the richest nations on the planet, having passed through one of the longest booms in this nation’s history, and we’re saying that we cannot deliver housing at an affordable rate to Middle Australia, let alone to Battler Australia. How is it that previous generations could manage this process but we can’t? Not only should housing be affordable to the vast majority but it should also be available to below-average income earners.

In the short term the resources boom will continue to attract labour and the birth rate will remain ascendant, placing pressure on the demand for accommodation, which will in turn push up rents.

The solution is to either moderate demand or to fix supply. But here’s the problem. To significantly lift the supply of affordable dwellings requires investment in urban infrastructure such as public transport. The reason is that affordable and developable tracts of land on the edge of capital cities that could make a difference to supply and affordability are located beyond the city limits.

Perhaps the reason why previous generations could deliver affordable housing was because at that time there was not the public consciousness and concern about car usage and the provision of associated urban services. And if this is the case, then perhaps the early decades (not just years) of the 21st century will be seen as a transition periods where Australian cities and funding priorities are fundamentally realigned.

Bernard Salt is a Partner with KPMG; bsalt@kpmg.com.au

A Million Houses Needed To Avoid Shortfall.

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

A MILLION new homes need to be built over the next five years to cope with Australia’s booming population, new figures out from the Housing Association show.

The number of houses currently being built falls well short of this, and according to the HIA, there’ll be a shortfall of at least 175,000 houses if current building rates continue.

The outlook is even bleaker if household sizes keep shrinking - ie more people choose to live alone - this could blow-out to a 240,000 shortfall.

“Supply must increase rapidly to meet expected demand,” said the Housing Industry Association’s chief executive of policy, Chris Lamont.

“Without a substantial increase in production there will almost certainly be a growth in the number of homeless and further affordability woes.”

He said the increased demand for new housing was driven by two main factors: rising  immigration, and more people choosing to live alone.

Australia’s population grew by 332,000, or 1.6 per cent last year.

Record-low affordability

A shortage of housing is one of the key drivers in record-low housing affordability.

The Housing Industry Association (HIA)/Commonwealth Bank First Home Buyer Affordability Index fell 3.5 per cent in the quarter, and was down 10 per cent on the same time last year. 

Mortgage repayments now account for 29.1 per cent of an average first home buyer’s income – the highest percentage on record.

Construction tailing off

Despite rising demand, the supply of new houses is dwindling as high rates put the squeeze on the property market. Official interest rates are sitting at 12-year high of 7.25 per cent. The Reserve Bank meets tomorrow to make its latest interest rate announcement, with most economists tipping rates will stay on hold.

Data out earlier this month showed that number of new residential homes being built in March quarter fell 3.3 per cent. Construction of new private houses fell 6.3 per cent in the quarter, while other typed of property – such as apartment – fared better with a 3 per cent rise.

More states suffered falls in new housing starts than rises in the quarter. Tasmania had a 13.3 per cent decline, Queensland 9 per cent, Western Australia 7.3 per cent, Victoria 4.8 per cent and the ACT 16.9 per cent. On the upside, South Australia rose 24.7 per cent, NSW was up 9.3 per cent and the Northern Territory rose 14.9 per cent.

June 30, 2008 12:27pm -  www.news.com.au

Home Prices to Explode, ANZ Bank Predicts

Tuesday, July 15th, 2008

THE ANZ Bank says the growing housing shortage is setting Australia up for the “mother of all” housing booms.New home

 

building figures

showing slumping building approvals have sparked fears of a price and rent explosion that will price even more prospective buyers out of the market.The ANZ’s senior economist, Paul Braddick, said yesterday Australia faced a critical and potentially chronic shortage of housing.

“A growing housing shortage is

 

 

 

setting the scene for the mother of all housing booms,” Mr Braddick said.”Demand has accelerated and rising immigration, both permanent and temporary, shows no sign of abating. Meanwhile, rising interest rates continue to stymie any building recovery.

“Underlying housing demand is already outstripping new supply, and the gap is set to widen sharply, driving pent-up housing demand to record levels,” he said.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics said yesterday new apartment approvals fell 18.2 per cent in May and were down 4.2 per cent over the past 12 months.

New house approvals fell 1.2 per cent and were down 1.7 per cent over the year. In Victoria total building approvals were up 2.8 per cent.

Commonwealth Securities chief equities economist Craig James said buyers had fled the property market because of high

 

interest rates

.”With population growing at the fastest rate in 18 years, we simply should be building more homes, not less,” he said.

“Interest rate hikes have spooked investors and budding owner-occupiers.

“Investors are putting their money in the bank and people are staying in the rental market longer. But the situation is unsustainable.”

Mr James said rents and house prices would be forced up because of the tight conditions, which would eventually attract more investors and lead to more building.

“The latest slump in new dwelling approvals is clearly bad news for those renting,” he said.

“The supply of apartments isn’t rising but the number of people wanting to rent certainly is.”

Victorian rents are at record highs and housing affordability is close to record lows.

The Commonwealth Bank’s senior economist, Michael Workman, said interest rates would need to start falling and buyers would need to believe prices were rising before they would re-enter the market.

The building approval slump has cut the odds of another interest rate increase from the Reserve Bank.

 

 

 

 

By Craig Binnie July 03, 2008 08:14am-   www.news.com.au

Good property investment starts at home for Queenslanders

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008

Article from:

Torny Jensen

June 21, 2008 12:00am

PROPERTY investors may be overlooking their own back yard with research finding there are good opportunities for investment in Queensland.

Dr Sacha Reid of property advice company DTZ said research conducted exclusively for The Courier-Mail revealed the Sunshine State had a bevy of property hot spots, including Ipswich, near Brisbane and Townsville.

Dr Reid said despite economic uncertainty throughout Australia, she had analysed a series of data, including median house values, population growth forecasts, planned infrastructure developments and employment opportunities to come up with the state’s best investment locations.

“Fundamentally, Queensland property remains strong even though concern and uncertainty are affecting much of the property sector at the moment,” Dr Reid said.

“Most of these concerns have focused on the consequence of global economic conditions, high domestic inflation, consecutive interest rate rises and affordability.”

Her picks included the Springfield/Ripley/Ipswich region, west of Brisbane.

Dr Reid said the area remained relatively affordable, with median house prices ranging from $325,000 to $375,000, while the area’s population was forecast to grow by 4.1 per cent a year over the next five years.

Planned infrastructure projects include the creation of the Springfield town centre where a million square metres of space has already been approved for development.

The existing Orion Shopping Centre at Springfield also is under expansion, with another 65,000sq m of retail space being added.

Dr Reid said overall the activity in the area could potentially create up to 50,000 new jobs.

Similarly, Dr Reid tipped Beaudesert as an area ripe for property investment with the local population expected to grow by 3.7 per cent a year over the next five years.

It is proposed the area will become a State Development Area for the new Scenic Rim region.

“The potential of the SDA is thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars of investment,” Dr Reid said.

Other areas selected by Dr Reid as standout investment spots include Hervey Bay, Caboolture, Townsville/Thuringowa, Gladstone/Calliope and Brisbane suburbs Chermside, Nundah and Milton.

Dr Reid said that despite the forecast for future growth in these centres, housing affordability continued to be a problem for Queensland home buyers.

“Housing affordability in Queensland has declined significantly over the last five years, never more evident than the March 2008 quarter where affordability in Brisbane declined by 15.2 per cent and regional Queensland by 3.5 per cent,” she said.

However she said capital value growth had continued to improve over the past four years. “While a steadying of this growth will occur this year in response to economic conditions, it is expected that growth will continue to be positive.”

 

 

21 point checklist modified from top Australian Property Investors.

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008

1.       Select properties within the $250,000 - $500,000 price range. Properties priced below $250,000 will, either be too small or not have the desired quality finishes or not be in the best area possible.

2.       Select properties in sought after ‘lifestyle locations’ that will attract consistent rental demand by quality tenants.

3.       Select properties in areas within 15kms of the CBD but not the CBD or some fringe areas.

4.       Select properties within suburbs and streets where limited land is available.

5.       Select properties in suburbs with proven capital growth over the past five years.

6.       Select property close to water, e.g. beaches, oceans and rivers.

7.       Select properties in suburbs that have high rental demand.

8.       Select properties that have affluent tenants with high disposable income

9.       Select properties that are located close to public transport

10.   Select properties that are in demand for corporate clients

11.   Select properties close to educational facilities, universities, major public and private schools

12.   Select properties close to major sporting, dining and entertainment precincts

13.   Select properties that have land content

14.   Select town house style properties

15.   Select properties that offer high depreciation and taxation benefits

16.   Select properties with projects whose income potential is not base on the ‘short term’ or ‘holiday letting’

17.   Select properties that are located within smaller low rise ‘boutique’ style properties

18.   Selecting a property where the price of the property offers at least a 4% gross rental return based on the ‘long – term’ rental guarantee the real estate agent is prepared to provide.

19.   Select properties within projects that are guaranteed to be built and completed.

20.   Don’t purchase off the plan property that is being sold ‘subject to permit’

21.   Select properties which have 3 or more bedrooms to increase rental income.

Soure: “What I Didn’t Learn At School But Wish I Had” Ebook - available from www.LearnToBeRich.com.au/free_products/free_ebooks.php 

To read the full set of 21 point checklist please visit http://learntoberich.com.au/free_products/free_ebooks.php and down load the ebook.